Unraveling ASC 842 and ASC 840 Differences
The world of lease accounting has evolved with the introduction of the new standard, ASC 842, which replaces the previous standard, ASC 840. This change has left many businesses seeking clarity on the main differences between the two standards and how they impact financial reporting. Let's delve into the critical distinctions between ASC 842 and ASC 840, breaking them down to help you better understand the transition
Under ASC 840, leases were classified as either capital leases (reported on the balance sheet) or operating leases (off-balance sheet). ASC 842, however, introduces a dual-model approach, classifying leases as either finance leases (similar to capital leases) or operating leases. While the classification criteria have changed slightly, the significant difference under ASC 842 is that both finance and operating leases must now be recognized on the balance sheet.
Balance Sheet Recognition
One of the main differences between ASC 842 and ASC 840 is the balance sheet recognition of operating leases. Under ASC 840, operating leases were not recognized on the balance sheet, which led to a lack of transparency regarding a company's lease obligations. With ASC 842, lessees are required to identify a right-of-use (ROU) asset and a lease liability for both finance and operating leases on their balance sheet, increasing financial transparency and providing a more accurate picture of a company's lease commitments.
Lease Component Separation
ASC 842 emphasizes separating lease and non-lease components in a contract. While ASC 840 also required separating these components, ASC 842 provides more specific guidance on allocating consideration to each element. For example, a contract may include a lease for office space and a maintenance service agreement. Under ASC 842, lessees must allocate the total consideration in the contract between the lease and non-lease components based on their relative standalone prices.
Sale and Leaseback Transactions
ASC 842 significantly changes the accounting treatment for sale and leaseback transactions compared to ASC 840. Under ASC 840, a sale and leaseback transaction could immediately recognize a gain or loss on the sale, depending on whether the leaseback was classified as a capital or operating lease. In contrast, ASC 842 requires the seller-lessee to assess whether the transaction qualifies as a sale under the new revenue recognition guidance (ASC 606). If the transaction qualifies as a sale, any gain or loss on the sale is generally deferred and recognized over the lease term.
ASC 842 requires more extensive lease-related disclosures than ASC 840. The new standard mandates qualitative and quantitative disclosures to provide users of financial statements with a clear understanding of the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. These additional disclosures include information about significant assumptions and judgments, lease expense, and maturity analysis of lease liabilities.
The transition from ASC 840 to ASC 842 brings significant changes to lease accounting, affecting lease classification, balance sheet recognition, lease component separation, sale and leaseback transactions, and disclosure requirements. By understanding these differences and adapting to the new standard, businesses can ensure accurate financial reporting, enhanced transparency, and improved compliance with lease accounting requirements.
Request a demo to see how gaapRT simplifies ASC 842.